|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
| Contrast Dance Theatre
Café Music For Piano Trio
Performed at Symphony Space
Reviewed on 04/10/05
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| A Chamber Ballet with Broadway Sass
|
|
Dance performances that include live musicians are vastly more powerful than dance performances in which prerecorded music is transmitted through speakers. Similarly, music concerts that incorporate dance expand the experience by offering a visual stimulus, as well as a translation of the music through bodily movement. The chamber music group America's Dream Chamber Artists mixed mediums at their “Inaugural Season Finale” by inviting Contrast Dance Theatre artistic director Christopher Fleming to choreograph a new ballet to composer Paul Schoenfield's Café Music for Piano Trio.
The chamber group performed Francis Poulenc's Sextet for Winds and Piano and Mozart's Concerto in C Major for Flute, Harp, and Orchestra, K. 299, before a small table, topped by a red rose and a glass of wine, was dragged out onto the corner of the stage to give a hint of a restaurant setting for Café Music. Violinist Cyrus Beroukhim, cellist Arash Amini, and pianist Melissa Marse took their places by the table and, leaving behind Mozart's 18th-century Europe, launched into Schoenfield's 1980s America. As the trio played the jazz- and ragtime-infused piece, eight dancers bustled onstage in colorful, sequin-specked costumes.
Performed in three short movements, the ballet lacked a clear narrative. It appeared to deal loosely with the relationships between men and women, but Fleming seemed more concerned with displaying his dancers' enthusiastic spirit than with communicating a message. Combining ballet, jazz, and modern dance, the performance featured a slew of saucy characters. One female dancer threw a leg up over a male dancer's shoulder as he picked her up and twirled her around; another was carried offstage kicking. Dancers en pointe, in second position, withered melodramatically like sun-stroked daisies. The sensational moments, such as when a man flipped a woman backwards over his shoulder, placed her down on the stage, then helped her into a one-armed back walkover, were interesting to watch, but the fantastic, high-energy choreography eventually highlighted a lack of precision. These dancers flowed over with pizzazz, but fell short when it came to classical technique. Still, the essence of a Broadway show gushed through each dramatic flip of the wrist, each sensational acrobatic stunt.
Artistic excellence?
***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? **
Was it healing? **
(Updated on 04/28/06)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
ABT
Performed at the City Center
Reviewed on 10/4/04
by Tamsin Nutter
|
| UWonderfully
Familiar, Wonderfully Strange
|
| American
Ballet Theatre’s annual City Center season is
upon us once again, a chance for the company to present
a bevy of short works ranging from old to new (October
19–November 6). Last fall I saw the ABT dancers
perform three works that seemed to offer a quick overview
of the evolution of modern ballet: Balanchine’s
Mozartiana, Christopher Wheeldon’s VIII, and Jiri
Kylian’s Sinfonietta. Of the three, Kylian’s
strange and lovely 1970s-era work seemed both the most
contemporary, and the most timeless.
Balanchine’s Mozartiana preserves its graceful
clarity and simplicity, an illustration of the unfussy
charm of Mozart’s music. Veronika Part gave a
ravishing, ecstatic performance of the “Preghiera”
solo. That glowing interiority, however, served her
less well in the “Theme and Variations”
duet with Maxim Beloserkovsky, in which the pair exhibited
little connection and Part looked down too much. The
quick footwork, too, is not really her forte. Playful,
precise footwork is exactly the forte of Herman Cornejo,
however, whose joyous, sprightly performance of the
“Gigue” solo was an unalloyed pleasure.
Today’s generation was represented by Wheeldon
in VIII, an ambitious piece about Henry VIII (Angel
Corella) and two of his wives, Katherine of Aragon (Paloma
Herrera) and Anne Boleyn (Julie Kent). Although lacking
the conceptual unity of the other pieces, VIII forays
into an intriguingly surrealist, cinematic mode of storytelling,
and Henry and each of his wives engage in some beautiful,
strange partnering (although occasionally the contortions
look undignified instead of interesting). Wheeldon gives
the “modern” moments a shade too much emphasis,
and his patterns remain staid. But the corps has some
wonderful movement passages, organic and quirky, and
it’s nice to see ballet dancers descend, even
awkwardly, to the floor.
In the beautiful, plotless Sinfonietta, Kylian plays
deftly with patterns and movement dynamics, and yet
the result is wonderfully humanist. As befits a great
work of art, movement, music, backdrop, and costumes
feel indivisible. The orchestra’s brass section
flanked the stage apron, so that Janacek’s spine-tingling
music, a golden cacophony of trumpets and trombones,
seemed to echo off the rolling hills of Walter Nobbe’s
gorgeous backdrop. A swirling community of men and women
ran, leaped, and hit the floor, punctuating the large-scale
patterns with bewitchingly unexpected little gestures:
a bow of the head, a hand drawn in slow motion across
the eyes. The ABT dancers enjoyed themselves, but most
were too soft or too blank; they needed a touch more
angularity or harshness. But no matter. Sinfonietta
is lushly romantic, yet skewed—familiar, yet strange—striking
a perfect balance, it seemed to me, between ballet’s
past and future.
Artistic excellence?
****
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 10/25/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
| Contrast Dance Theatre
Café Music For Piano Trio
Performed at Symphony Space
Reviewed on 04/10/05
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| A Chamber Ballet with Broadway Sass
|
|
Dance performances that include live musicians are vastly more powerful than dance performances in which prerecorded music is transmitted through speakers. Similarly, music concerts that incorporate dance expand the experience by offering a visual stimulus, as well as a translation of the music through bodily movement. The chamber music group America's Dream Chamber Artists mixed mediums at their “Inaugural Season Finale” by inviting Contrast Dance Theatre artistic director Christopher Fleming to choreograph a new ballet to composer Paul Schoenfield's Café Music for Piano Trio.
The chamber group performed Francis Poulenc's Sextet for Winds and Piano and Mozart's Concerto in C Major for Flute, Harp, and Orchestra, K. 299, before a small table, topped by a red rose and a glass of wine, was dragged out onto the corner of the stage to give a hint of a restaurant setting for Café Music. Violinist Cyrus Beroukhim, cellist Arash Amini, and pianist Melissa Marse took their places by the table and, leaving behind Mozart's 18th-century Europe, launched into Schoenfield's 1980s America. As the trio played the jazz- and ragtime-infused piece, eight dancers bustled onstage in colorful, sequin-specked costumes.
Performed in three short movements, the ballet lacked a clear narrative. It appeared to deal loosely with the relationships between men and women, but Fleming seemed more concerned with displaying his dancers' enthusiastic spirit than with communicating a message. Combining ballet, jazz, and modern dance, the performance featured a slew of saucy characters. One female dancer threw a leg up over a male dancer's shoulder as he picked her up and twirled her around; another was carried offstage kicking. Dancers en pointe, in second position, withered melodramatically like sun-stroked daisies. The sensational moments, such as when a man flipped a woman backwards over his shoulder, placed her down on the stage, then helped her into a one-armed back walkover, were interesting to watch, but the fantastic, high-energy choreography eventually highlighted a lack of precision. These dancers flowed over with pizzazz, but fell short when it came to classical technique. Still, the essence of a Broadway show gushed through each dramatic flip of the wrist, each sensational acrobatic stunt.
Artistic excellence?
***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? **
Was it healing? **
(Updated on 04/28/06)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
|
| Big
Apple Circus
Picturesque
Performed at the Damrosch Park,
Lincoln Center
Reviewed on 10/23/04
by Tamsin Nutter
|
| Unforgettable,
Every Year
|
| Autumn
is upon us in New York, bringing crisp, bright days
and the desire to bake apple pies. For New Yorkers of
all ages, autumn also brings the Big Apple Circus, which
each year raises the Big Top in Lincoln Center. This
year’s show, Grandma Goes to Hollywood (October
20–January 8), promises to “bring the celluloid
dreams of the silver screen into the circus ring!”
If last year’s Picturesque is anything to go by,
don’t miss it.
2003’s Carnevale, the theme of which lent itself
well to exuberant movement, music, and costumes, linked
its disparate acts very effectively. 2004’s Picturesque,
which dedicated each act to a famous artist inspired
by the circus (Picasso, Magritte, Toulouse-Lautrec,
etc.), proved less thematically coherent, yet still
offered plenty of laughter and thrills.
Big Apple Circus’s MVP remains Grandma, the inspired
creation of clown Barry Lubin. Grandma, in pearls and
a housedress, is like a gray-wigged Lucy Ricardo, eager
to try anything, from juggling to playing the tuba.
The kids adore her (and they’re not the only ones).
Grandma’s opposite in both Carnevale and Picturesque
was Vallery Serebryakov, a malign Dennis the Menace
in a striped shirt. These two performers are worth their
weight in gold.
That’s not to say the clowns carried Picturesque
unaided. Notable among the show’s acts was the
effervescent Picaso Jr., a man with a gift not merely
for physical comedy, but for juggling five table-tennis
balls at a time using just his mouth. Another highlight
was Svetlana Shamsheeva’s trained animals. The
dogs and birds were delightful, but the cats really
brought down the house. An army of fluffy Persians—natural
acrobats to a feline—rode on dogs, carried white
doves, and shinned up thirty-foot poles on command.
Also a hit was the Chinese vase balancing act of GuiMing
Meng, who spun, balanced, and tossed increasingly enormous
and heavy ceramic pots on and from his forehead.
The acrobatics were generally less exciting than in
Carnevale. Safety ropes seemed all too visible, and
I missed the storytelling aspect which made many of
the previous year’s acts so delightful. The exception,
for sheer awe-inspiring tricks, was the Kovgar Troupe.
Chagall backdrops seemed quite unnecessary to people
doing multiple flips while wearing stilts.
Some of the art-historical references, such as the strobe
lights and industrial smoke of “Constructivist
Trapeze,” did not suit the circus’s giddy
aesthetic. And a recurring bit with ringmaster Dinny
McGuire attempting to chat up some Degas ballerinas
was too undeveloped (not surprisingly, since it’s
a bit inappropriate for the audience) to be funny. But
McGuire’s art history lecture turned (somehow)
into Grandma lipsynching “Unforgettable”
as a duet with an unfortunate audience member. Genius.
Artistic excellence?
***
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 10/25/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
|
| Myung
Soo Kim
Arirang: Korean Ritual
Solos
Performed at the Dance Theatre Workshop
Reviewed on 7/9/2005
by R.Pikser
|
| Arirang:
Korean Ritua Solos
|
| Arirang,
although an indefinable term, according to the notes
accompanying Myung Soo Kim’s program of seven
shamanic solos, represents feelings known to most people.
It is the name of a hill with a sad history of deaths;
it is the name of a song of farewell and separation;
it is a feeling of arrival in a new place; and it represents
the personal journey of Ms. Kim as conduit to the past
and present-day persecuted political artist. (During
most of the 1990s, Ms. Kim lived abroad as a political
refugee because her visits to North Korea had violated
South Korean law. The South Korean government pardoned
her in 1998.)
The presentation of the evening was impeccable,
the stage set with clouds of floating butterflies and
pools of lotus flowers, all beautifully lit by Erik
C. Bruce. Ms. Kim was seen through a narrow opening
of the upstage black curtain sewing a costume which
then flew into the air, where it hovered throughout
the evening. She then lay down to rest surrounded by
live trees arranged in delicate perspective. When she
arose, she donned her first costume, privately singing
to a recording, but in partial view. Ms. Kim returned
to this semi-private world before each of the seven
dances that composed the evening, and we could watch
her don the many-layered costume for each dance, always
accompanied by music.
Each of the costumes was specific to its dance, several
of which involved the exorcism of evil spirits, and
another, prayers for prosperity. The program notes were
filled with information on the history and meaning of
each dance, yet, to the untrained eye, the dances were
similar in movement. This probably stems from their
very shamanic origins. Dance meant to transform the
dancer/shaman, or to relate that dancer/shaman to the
powers of the universe, is not necessarily presentationally
interesting. Ms. Kim has worked hard to undercut this
problem. The degree to which she has succeeded depends
on the viewer. What is not viewer-dependent is the importance
of Ms. Kim in maintaining these ancient traditions and
bringing them to Korea, North and South, and to the
rest of the world.
Artistic excellence?
*****
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 10/20/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
|
|
New York City Ballet
An
American in Paris
Performed at the New York State Theatre
Reviewed on 5/10/2005
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| New
Works Nod to the Classics of Ballet and the Big Screen
|
| Little girls
dressed like Madeline scurried after a nun, Tour de
France bikers dashed across the stage, and young lovers
in bright green and purple satin coquetted all through
Christopher Wheeldon’s new ballet An American
in Paris. The New York City Ballet Orchestra splayed
the bombastic, jubilant, pomp of George Gershwin’s
score against a backdrop of Parisian apartment buildings
tilted askew, as principal dancers Damian Woetzel, Carla
Körbes, and Jenifer Ringer festooned the ballet
with a big dash of Hollywood glam.
Ringer danced with cheerful innocence,
perfectly portraying a lovelorn ingénue of the
1950s. The splashy scenery and frenzied cross-stage
movement, as townsfolk dashed here and there, distracted
from the individual excellence of the dancers. But Ringer
and Woetzel’s duets gleamed with the free-spirited,
eager ambition of young love.
Though the short ballet lacked the emotional
depth and dramatic undercurrents of a lasting work,
Wheeldon provided a sweet, happy piece that offered
a glimpse into the Technicolor vibrancy of post-war
Paris.
Earlier in the program, Peter Boal and
Wendy Whelan danced a riveting Distant Cries, choreographed
by Edwaard Liang, that gushed with pure grace. The dreamlike
piece began with Whelan alone downstage, in a filmy
light-blue costume that flowed around her body with
every movement. As the notes of a flute sounded, Boal
ran out from the darkness and lifted her. The duo danced
together with the passion of illicit lovers, releasing
their inhibitions as privacy protected them.
Darci Kistler, Sofiane Sylve, and Miranda
Weese all fawned about Jock Soto as the retiring principal,
renowned for his partnering, had his pick during the
new Peter Martins ballet Tala Gaisma. Peteris Vasks’s
music for violin and string quartet rushed around the
modernly outfitted dancers as the choreography nudged
them into gorgeous poses that bragged of extreme flexibility
and precision. Moving through the brisk, fiery passages,
the women resembled flames, as the strip of red in their
flesh-colored costumes coiled around their bodies during
streams of chainé turns. As Soto paired up with
each female dancer in turn, he seemed unaware of all
else while the duet lasted.
A mirror to Tala Gaisma, both in personnel
and with its theme of the male hero, George Balanchine’s
Apollo, with music by Igor Stravinsky, opened the evening.
With simple, all-white costumes, and stark, civil choreography,
the piece was a solid anchor to a night of new works.
Nilas Martins, Alexandra Ansanelli, Ashley Bouder, and
Rachel Rutherford danced with the gracious bravado of
Greek gods.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ****
(Updated on 9/20/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Saeko Ichinohe Dance
Company
The 35th Anniversary Celebration
Performance
Performed at The Kaye Playhouse
Reviewed on 3/31/2005
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| Where
Ethereal Goddesses and Bizarre Mutants Are All at Home
|
| An abundance
of characters flashed through the Saeko Ichinohe Dance
Company’s performance last March at the Kaye Playhouse,
the most endearing of which bore human traits but were
strangely foreign in one way or another. They represented
concrete ideas through abstract expression, much like
Ichinohe’s choreography as a whole.
Celebrating the company’s 35th anniversary,
Ichinohe celebrated the present, with the premiere of
a new piece for four female dancers, Pearl; the past,
with the performance of five pieces from her repertoire;
and the future, with a new work by the American choreographer
Jeff Moen.
Though Pearl, “a prayer for peace
and harmony in honor of those who have lost their lives
by terrorist attack and by natural disasters,”
succeeded in its embodiment of serenity, it lacked dynamic
variation. Simplicity remained a force throughout the
piece. Often accompanied by a lone violin, the dancers,
in fluid white costumes, moved cleanly and classically,
occasionally resembling the three graces.
In contrast to Pearl, Fire-Eating Bird,
which premiered in 1966, excited with vibrant costuming
and dramatic choreography. Dancer Katie Higham-Kessler
appeared on stage like a stealth lizard, serpentine
in a fantastic bodysuit from which a strip of red fabric
streamed from her neck down her torso and spilled out
in accordion pleats between her legs. Transforming into
a speed racer, she crouched low, long limbs outstretched,
while jagged electronic music shattered around her.
In the fascinating Head, from 1984, four
dancers became mutilated creatures residing in a surreal
world. They moved with angular, disjointed motions;
shoulders popped in and out awkwardly, resembling the
movements of chickens. One dancer’s hip seemed
stuck for a moment, as she grabbed her thigh and hobbled
about. A visually stunning ending occurred as dancers
ambled out with their backs to the audience, heads bowed,
and placed their wrists against the crowns of their
heads so that a hand seemed to grow from the neck. Ichinohe’s
Duet from Yuki (Snow) and Dew of Hagi were also performed
as part of the section denoting the past.
Beautiful choreography that brought to
mind images of nature made up Dreams Wandering Over
a Withered Field, a new work by the American choreographer
Jeff Moen. Inspired by the Japanese poet Basho, Moen’s
dreamlike movements resembled sea grass billowing beneath
the ocean; the dancers appeared as if in a trance. A
magnetism exuded from the stage, as dancers seemed lured
to a mysteriously enthralling staff that filled everyone
who touched it with bliss.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? **
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? **
(Updated on 9/20/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Contrast Dance Theatre
Café Music For Piano Trio
Performed at Symphony Space
Reviewed on 4/10/2005
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| A
Chamber Ballet with Broadway Sass
|
| Dance performances
that include live musicians are vastly more powerful
than dance performances in which prerecorded music is
transmitted through speakers. Similarly, music concerts
that incorporate dance expand the experience by offering
a visual stimulus, as well as a translation of the music
through bodily movement. The chamber music group America’s
Dream Chamber Artists mixed mediums at their “Inaugural
Season Finale” by inviting Contrast Dance Theatre
artistic director Christopher Fleming to choreograph
a new ballet to composer Paul Schoenfield’s Café
Music for Piano Trio.
The chamber group performed Francis Poulenc’s
Sextet for Winds and Piano and Mozart’s Concerto
in C Major for Flute, Harp, and Orchestra, K. 299, before
a small table, topped by a red rose and a glass of wine,
was dragged out onto the corner of the stage to give
a hint of a restaurant setting for Café Music.
Violinist Cyrus Beroukhim, cellist Arash Amini, and
pianist Melissa Marse took their places by the table
and, leaving behind Mozart’s 18th-century Europe,
launched into Schoenfield’s 1980s America. As
the trio played the jazz- and ragtime-infused piece,
eight dancers bustled onstage in colorful, sequin-specked
costumes.
Performed in three short movements, the
ballet lacked a clear narrative. It appeared to deal
loosely with the relationships between men and women,
but Fleming seemed more concerned with displaying his
dancers’ enthusiastic spirit than with communicating
a message. Combining ballet, jazz, and modern dance,
the performance featured a slew of saucy characters.
One female dancer threw a leg up over a male dancer’s
shoulder as he picked her up and twirled her around;
another was carried offstage kicking. Dancers en pointe,
in second position, withered melodramatically like sun-stroked
daisies. The sensational moments, such as when a man
flipped a woman backwards over his shoulder, placed
her down on the stage, then helped her into a one-armed
back walkover, were interesting to watch, but the fantastic,
high-energy choreography eventually highlighted a lack
of precision. These dancers flowed over with pizzazz,
but fell short when it came to classical technique.
Still, the essence of a Broadway show gushed through
each dramatic flip of the wrist, each sensational acrobatic
stunt.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? **
Was it healing? **
(Updated on 9/20/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Richmond Ballet
Performed at The Joyce Theater
Reviewed on 4/05/2005
by Joan Musaro
|
| Virginia's
Pride
|
| In her 25
years as artistic director, Stoner Winslett has forged
the Richmond Ballet into an organization that brings
classical ballet to the state of Virginia, enriches
the lives of children through outreach programs, and
fosters new choreography while preserving ballet’s
classics. For their first appearance in New York, the
troupe, Virginia’s designated state ballet company,
offered programs of works created on the Richmond Ballet
and never before seen in New York, an ambitious venture
by any standards.
From the first bars of the familiar tango
music of Astor Piazzolla, it was clear why the company
has attracted choreographers. The artists are accomplished
both technically and theatrically, displaying charm,
sophistication, and beauty. Nuevo Tango, by choreographer
William Soleau, who has several ballets in Richmond’s
repertory, captured the drama, sensuality, and playfulness
of Piazzolla’s music while still using the style
and technique of classical dance. Soleau’s pas
de deux evoked the tango, rather than attempting to
have ballerinas literally do the tango en pointe, a
trap too many choreographers fall into. The brightly
lit stage, glowing with reds and oranges, became a nightclub;
the dancers manipulated barstools into various lines
and configurations, incorporating them into their dances,
suggesting the atmosphere of an Argentine dancehall.
This piece proved a good introduction to the skills
and charm of the dancers.
Jessica Lang’s A Maiden’s Hymn,
set to Schubert’s “Death and the Maiden”
string quartet, followed. This work presented Richmond
Ballet’s dramatic skills as the familiar story
of the music was enacted through dance. A young woman,
too soon chosen by death, mourns her fate as her friends
and beloved try to protect and save her. She is comforted
and helped to make the transition from this life to
the next, but Death proves determined. Jenna McClintock
was touching and strong as the maiden, showing us her
torment and sorrow at leaving her sweetheart behind,
and her male colleagues offered excellent support. Ms.
Lang told the story well within a minimal setting through
movement alone.
The best was saved for last as the punked-up
dancers, in street clothes, combat boots, tattoos, and
wild hair, danced in the streets in Streets and Legends,
an athletic display of ballet and hip-hop meant as a
salute to contemporary Scotland. The music of Alistair
Fraser and Ashley MacIsaac combines modern electric
fiddle rock with hints of traditional Scottish music
and provides English choreographer Colin Connor with
the perfect sound for his salute to the spirit, heritage,
humor, and defiance of Scottish youth. The dancers were
ferocious, able to let loose and throw themselves into
the modern ballet movements. This was a rousing end
to a terrific display by very accomplished and entertaining
dancers.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ****
(Updated on 9/20/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: KPMAssociates
|
|
Les Ballets Grandiva
Performed at Symphony Space
Reviewed on 4/14/2005
by Joan Musaro
|
| Ballet
Gems
|
| In the theater
world, an ancient history exists of men performing female
roles. In recent times, audiences have come to appreciate
the spectacle of men dancing as female prima ballerinas,
complete with tiaras, tutus, and toe shoes. Les Ballets
Grandiva is “built” in this tradition: serious
students of dance performing traditional ballet choreography,
en pointe or not. Like their more familiar colleagues
the Trockaderos, many of these men are quite accomplished
in female roles, and many simply look like football
players in drag—and that is half the fun.
The evening began with several old “war-horses,”
traditional showstoppers from the classical repertory.
Company director Victor Trevino staged Le Grande Pas
De Quatre, after Perrot. To the familiar strains of
Pugni, the Grandivas reinterpreted the roles originated
by four of Romantic ballet’s most famous dancers:
Taglioni, Cerrito, Grisi, and Grahn. Natalia Macabre
(Brian Norris) struck just the right haughty tone as
Taglioni, who, due either to seniority or a bad back,
held herself above the others. The billowing skirts
and appearance of lightness achieved by the Romantic
ballerinas were approximated by these dancers as best
they could, each trying to upstage the other to win
audience approval.
The great bravura display that is Le Corsaire
followed. This work, popularized in the west by Fonteyn
and Nureyev, enabled the leading ballerina of the troupe
to shine. Tatiana Deblockova is sensational. Looking
every muscular inch a ballerina, her technical assurance
and aplomb were brilliant as she executed the difficult
choreography perfectly; she was well matched in the
traditional steps by her partner, Momchil Mladenov.
Ms. Deblockova’s alter ego, Bart De Block, has
developed the ability to dance en pointe to such an
extent that pointe roles have been created for him in
traditional dance companies.
On a lighter note, the quaint humor and
mischief of commedia dell’arte was enjoyable in
Harlequinade. Tetsushi Segawa and Palomina Carrera (Camilo
Rodriguez) demonstrated their technical assurance and
understanding of the playful humor and romance of the
period.
The pas de deux from Romeo and Juliet to
the familiar Prokofiev score and the solo danced to
Saint-Saëns’s The Dying Swan were less successful.
The general technical ability of these dancers to perform
en pointe is not as fully developed as it will be, and
their attempts at humor were too heavy-handed in these
pieces.
Finally, what made this evening unique
and special was the world premiere of a new work, Semi-Precious
Stones. This ballet takes its inspiration from the world
of semi-precious gems, but emulates Balanchine’s
Jewels, which had already claimed Emeralds, Rubies,
and Diamonds. This dance is therefore left to celebrate
the special beauty of Peridot, Garnets, and Zirconia.
This alone is hilarious, and the dance itself is ingenious,
often echoing the original with Balanchinian “walking”
steps in “Peridot,” jazzy hip rotations
in “Garnets,” and regal imperiousness setting
the tone in “Zirconia.” The knowledgeable
audience registered its approval as it recognized these
key attributes. The dancers, because they performed
the material with sincerity, were in general excellent,
and the jokes, inherent in the choreography, were extremely
well done. This is inspired work by choreographers Trevino,
Marcus Galante, and Peter Anastos respectively and is
destined to become a company classic.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 9/16/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
Photo: Members of Washington Reflections
Dance Company. Photo courtesy of the Dance Institute
of Washington.
|
|
Washington Reflections
Dance Company
Performed at Dance Theater Workshop
Reviewed on 6/25/2005
by R. Pikser
|
| Lots
of Smoke, Some Fire
|
| Fifteen years
ago, Fabian Barnes, a former soloist with Dance Theatre
of Harlem, founded the Dance Institute of Washington,
an organization serving inner-city children. The DIW
has been celebrated by Presidents Bush I and Clinton,
Oprah Winfrey, CNN, and the Today Show, and the list
of Mr. Barnes’s board members and supporters shows
how well connected he is in the D.C. arts world. It
was all the more disappointing, then, to see the low
level of choreography chosen by Mr. Barnes for the talented
dancers of the DIW’s professional company, Washington
Reflections, to perform.
Of the six pieces presented, only the two
by the gifted Thaddeus Davis showed disciplined work
on the part of the choreographer. Mr. Davis, in addition
to his ample creativity, appears to have studied composition;
he knows how to place his dancers on the stage, how
to move them from place to place, and how to juxtapose
groups and have them interact. He also makes, or perhaps
allows, his dancers to look good.
The final ballet of the evening, Spoken
Word, choreographed by company member Derrick Spear,
was an example of the need for mentoring. Mr. Spear,
pastiching snippets of speeches by the Reverend Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr., and laying these over or under
the music by Arvo Pärt, seemed to understand neither
the import of the words, beyond the most literal meaning,
nor their historical context. One has to question the
depth of his knowledge as to why Dr. King is celebrated.
Surely, with some help from a trained and experienced
choreographer, Mr. Spears could do better. The same
must be said for the other choreographers on the program.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? **
Was it healing? **
(Updated on 9/13/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Joyce Soho Presents
Performed at Joyce Soho
Reviewed on 5/6/05, 5/13/05, 5/20/05
by Tamsin Nutter
|
| New
Voices, From Digital Universes to Klezmer Comedy
|
| Emerging-choreographer
showcases can range from hideous to sublime, yet they're
also one of the great things about living in New York-a
feeling of possibility, of discovery, makes the grab-bag
exciting. In May the Joyce Soho held a three-weekend
series of young choreographers that even turned up a
few gems.
Technology, that alluring but tricky partner, informed
several offerings, most notably in Abby Man-Yee Chan's
enchanting, nightmarish Spectrum. The standout
piece of the series, Spectrum was full of astonishing
optical illusions (for which Akiyoshi Kitaoko is credited)
and tiny, quirky gestures of Chan's expressive fingers,
toes, and hips, magnified and defined by light and shadow.
As Chan frolicked and made shadow pictures in the strange,
fearsome world of Kevin Wu's video, a red bar shot across
the screen, then pressed menacingly closer like a torture
device of Dr. No's. Our heroine in white shrank away
in terror-to awake in a path of digital moonlight. Other
pieces dealt less successfully with Joyce Soho's low-tech
environs, in particular Kiyoko Kashiwagi's endearingly
weird but too elliptical Metamorphosis. Kashiwagi
is a gifted mime, yet required more than Kazuhiro Soda's
simple video to create an environment for her goggled,
black-hooded character's antics. Nicole Wolcott's
Render had the opposite problem: Here Bruna DeAraujo
and Andrew Personette's digital visuals overwhelmed
performer Naoko Kikuchi, so that her simple motions
seemed in the end incidental.
Other promising voices included Cid Pearlman, the duo
of Ori Flomin and Antonio Ramos, and Sunhwa Chung. Pearlman's
Strange Toys was an off-kilter duet for Liz
Hoefner and David King, to music by Kronos Quartet alumna
Joan Jeanrenaud. The piece was a little too cute, and
Pearlman seems more creative with gesture than with
large movements, yet Strange Toys was also
intriguingly disjunctive in quality-as if the dancers
were reacting to things that hadn't happened, or that
we couldn't see.
Flomin and Ramos, both veterans of the companies of
Stephen Petronio, Kevin Wynn, and Neil Greenberg, performed
the freaky Lost Before Found, accompanied by
Jane Gabriels's mad, breathy spoken word, and almost
dominated by Sam Glassman's psychosexual-Edward-Gorey
set and costumes. The two men, clean, chunky movers
both, shared an angry, sexual connection in their tense
and tenuous partnering. Meanwhile, Gabriels waved her
gauntlets with long twiggy fingers and moaned, half-laughed
into the microphone, “I found you! We were
lost a long time, but I found you…” The piece
seemed an enticing snippet of still stranger journeys
to come.
And Sunhwa Chung's It Doesn't Matter. It Already
Happened proved disappointing simply because its
first section was so good. Under a bamboo-patterned
spotlight, Claire Malaquias, in long dark coat and knee-boots,
executed a flurry of fierce, ritualistic gestures that
seemed half martial arts, half hip-hop isolations. Her
tai-chi precision and the clanging music, like a gamelan
of pots and pans, sent chills up the spine. The following
two sections, while handsome enough, were considerably
less riveting.
All of the pieces presented had something to recommend
them, even those that were less successful. Daniel Linehan's
solo Digested Noise was briefly amusing-to
hear an adult humming, gasping, sucking, and making
a host of other noises in public-but the gimmick quickly
palled given the paucity of the movement content. Stephanie
Batten Bland's polished A little Piece of A part
was too spatially weak to survive its affected air of
apocalyptic ennui. Yet the piece, notable for its handsome,
stylishly dressed band of Paris-based dancers, ended
in an exceptionally lovely group structure. And while
group sections were an unoriginal mess in Todd Williams's
balletic Halfshadow, the beginning and end
had nice moments-Williams, a veteran of both NYCB and
Petronio, opened the piece with a solo of soft, attentive
clarity.
Some dances displayed a gap between intention and present
ability. Breezy Berryman's ambitious but repetitive
Widow's Walk will doubtless be stronger when the
dancers make it more their own. Near the end, Berryman
did create chills as the women lifted the stiffly outstretched
men shoulder-height; the men slid to the floor, and
the women stood desolate as if over an open grave. In
contrast, Sharon Estacio's well-rehearsed duet Undergrowth,
an excerpt, was altogether smaller in scale yet nicely
put together. Estacio and Lena Gilbert curled and swung
lusciously across the floor, their siren-like slithering
punctuated by tricky partnering and surprising twists.
(One cavil: The any-old-thing costumes.)
The series ended with another piece setting itself a
high benchmark, and almost hitting it: Janice Lancaster's
frantic St. John's Wort, in which six brightly dressed
dancers mugged it up to klezmer music. The piece needs
tightening, but Lancaster does a lot of things well
here. She deploys her dancers well in space, and she
exploits beautifully klezmer's loopy, slightly sinister,
and deeply infectious rhythms, melodies, and unexpected
tempo changes. The dancers are a strong ensemble, even
if some are presently better comedians than others.
Well, comedy is hard. And it's always great to see choreographers
and dancers unafraid to go after it.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 8/4/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: Marianne Leach
|
|
Ballet Builders
Ballet Builders 2005
Performed at
Reviewed on 4/10/05
by R. Pikser
|
| Freshness
and a Spirit of Exploration
|
| Ballet Builders
provides aspiring and more established choreographers
with a venue in which to practice their craft and be
seen. Six of the seven choreographers presented this
year were experienced, and it was two of the most experienced
who showed the freshness and spirit of exploration that
one expects from this series.
Bonnie Scheibman's opener, Slow Dance, performed
by a nervous Lydia Walker and a charmingly attentive
Stephen Straub, blended ballroom and classical dance
in a pleasingly classical structure. The piece was not
groundbreaking, but well crafted and proportioned. Ms.
Walker is lovely, but she should try to focus her eyes
as she looks up and out as she has apparently been coached
to do. At the moment, she tends to look a little lost.
Paul Vasterling, artistic director of the Nashville
Ballet, presented Efimero, to a movement of
Bach's Keyboard Concerto #3. Sadie Harris and Jon Upleger,
simply and effectively costumed by Audrey Hyde, performed
with a cool restraint, almost a detachment, that created
a dramatic tension between their seeming lack of affect
and the hyperemotional movements with much arching and
flinging. The work could have done with a bit more dynamic
structuring on the part of the dancers, but was still
quite interesting, even disturbing.
Gina Patterson's No Defense was the gem of
the evening. Ms. Patterson has a very personal rhythmic
sense, so that movement attacks and transitions are
slightly out of synchronization with what is normally
done, yet not at all awkward. The movement itself, also
just a little strange, demands attention and that we
reconsider our expectations. The full range of dynamics
is employed, whether in “Ship Without a Sea” in which
a couple breaks up, or in “King & Queen,” juicily performed
by Margot Brown with the able assistance of Jim Stein
in a sort of Joys of Sex duo. Interestingly,
“The Silent Night,” in which Ms. Patterson herself performed
with Eric Midgley, was the least specific in its movements
and, although the dancing was beautiful, the least memorable
choreographically.
Ballet Builders has once again provided dance fans with
some things to look at, some things to consider, and
an opportunity to look at dance with fresh eyes, stimulating
artistic sensibilities that may have become too comfortable.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 8/4/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: Damir Yusupov
|
|
The Bolshoi Ballet
The Pharaoh's Daughter
Performed at Metropolitan Opera House
Reviewed on 7/30/05
by Joan Musaro
|
| Dance
at the Pharaoh's Court
|
| In 1862, Marius
Petipa presented The Pharaoh's Daughter, an
exotic, five-hour extravaganza for over 400 dancers,
at the Maryinsky Theater in St. Petersburg. A sensation,
the ballet established Petipa's choreographic career.
This summer, the Bolshoi Ballet chose to close their
New York season with Pierre Lacotte's reconstruction
of The Pharaoh's Daughter, premiered in Moscow
in 2000. They saved the best for last.
Lacotte, a French dancer and choreographer, has made
a career of reconstructing “lost” ballets. By researching
original material, either written or first-hand accounts,
he has succeeded in bringing many ballets back to life,
perhaps most notably Taglioni's original La Sylphide.
Petipa, another Frenchman who from 1869-1903 served
as choreographer and ballet master of the Maryinsky
Theater, left only sketchy notes on the choreography
and designs for The Pharaoh's Daughter. Fortunately,
one of Lacotte's teachers was Lubov Egorova, a dancer
in the Russian Imperial Ballet during Petipa's time.
She taught Lacotte all she remembered about the great
master: how he taught and choreographed, how he wanted
the arms to look, even a few variations. Lacotte decided
to rechoreograph the ballet based upon his various sources
of information, cutting its length and reshaping Pugni's
score.
The results are spectacular. One can imagine how overwhelmed
the ballet-going public must have been in 1862 by the
Pharaoh's court, the mummies and tombs, the exquisite
underwater scene, and the exotic jungle beasts. Lacotte
also designed the Egyptian-motif sets and costumes,
using the remaining documentation as a guide. The grand
scale of the current production allows us to fully appreciate
the grand, large-scale dancing and performance qualities
of the Bolshoi artists. The processions, charming dances
for children, and sustained classical variations for
the men, women, and corps demonstrate their clear footwork,
exquisite jumps and strong dramatic expressiveness.
The choreography throughout is musical and inventive,
exploiting the power of the dancers through meticulous,
precise dancing, not simply bombast.
The women in the company are outstanding (the men are
not as uniformly good). All have great placement, with
wonderfully articulate feet and beautiful arms and hands.
As, Aspicia, the Pharaoh's daughter, Svetlana Zakharova
was exquisite. The beautiful woman with gloriously arched
feet and sky-high extensions we first knew from the
Kirov Ballet is now a creamy-smooth ballerina of great
musicality, clarity, line, and touching dramatic depth.
Ekaterina Krysanova, Ekaterina Shipulina, and Olga Stebletsova
were magnificent in their respective solo variations
as the rivers Guadalquivir, Congo, and Neva, with each
receiving the appropriate ethnic and geographic accompaniment,
perhaps the precursors of the national dances we have
come to know in Petipa ballets. This was the entire
Bolshoi at its expressive best. Bravo! Here's hoping
the company returns soon.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ****
(Updated on 8/3/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
Sarah Edgar
Photo: Brian Novatny
|
|
Courtesan
Sarah Edgar/Dance
Performed at: Soundance at The Stable
Reviewed on 5/22/05
by R. Pikser
|
| Lessons
of the Past
|
| Sarah Edgar
is a beginning choreographer, and like other beginners,
she could do with a guiding hand. The idea for her work,
Courtesan, is quite interesting: to explore the
demi-monde of 18th- and 19th-century Europe using music
of the time. The opening “Forlana,” danced with enchanting
precision and nuance by Joy Havens and performed to
Bach, was a reconstruction by Ms. Edgar of a baroque
dance. The next piece, “Les caractères de la Boudoir”
(sic), Ms. Edgar's own choreography to music of Rameau,
was supposed to be titillating, as two women seduced
each other, quarreled, then gave themselves to each
other. Though certain gestures suggested the theme,
most of the dance movements were generalized, repetitive,
and neither sexy nor seductive. This criticism applies
to the rest of the program. Ms. Edgar herself relies
on her expressive eyes and face to the exclusion of
the use of her body, except when she is performing actual
baroque dances, when she is lovely. In her choreography,
she relies on one or two gestures and has not learned
to apply the precision and structure that baroque music
and dance should have taught her during her time with
the New York Baroque Dance Company. She has done her
historical research. She has some interesting ideas.
Now she needs to apply some choreographic discipline
so that she and her dancers will shine consistently,
rather than in brief flashes.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 6/22/05)
|
|
|
| Theater
review
|
|
Hecuba
The Royal Shakespeare Company
Performed at: The
Brooklyn Academy of Music
Reviewed on 6/22/05
by Joan Musaro
|
| Man's
Inhumanity to Man
|
| War
is hell. This was as true thousands of years ago as
it is today. Euripedes play, Hecuba, written 2,500 years
ago, describes the aftereffects of the Trojan Wars.
British poet Tony Harrison wrote and directed this adaptation
of the play, and the Royal Shakespeare Company gives
a stark, minimal presentation that focuses on the presence
of Vanessa Redgrave in the title role.
Hecuba, once Queen of Troy, loses everything.
She survives and becomes a prisoner, with her surviving
daughter, Polyxena. Without a husband and sons and no
longer a queen, she is horrified to learn that the victorious
Athenian army wishes further revenge by sacrificing
her daughter too. Agonized, Hecuba must stand by and
watch as her daughter willingly goes to her death preferring
that it be her choice. Wracked with grief, Hecuba plots
her revenge upon her captors.
Es Devlin’s set and costumes contribute
an evocative atmosphere. The rows of tents that ring
the stage serve as sentinels giving witness to the stark
realities of life in a prison camp. The women of Troy,
living in the tents and held captive with Hecuba, tell
their story through sung recitation of the events that
took place: the gory battles they witnessed, the pain,
their suffering and the treachery that is war. It is
clear immediately that the ancient tale still speaks
loudly to a modern audience all too familiar with war.
Any appearance on the stage of Vanessa
Redgrave is an occasion. Literally a larger than life
figure, she is a tall woman with a shock of white hair
and as Hecuba, is dressed in rags. Looking tired and
haggard, her appearance is quite literally shocking.
Figuratively too she is overwhelming, her suffering
is palpable. However, the actress delivered her lines
with a cadence that made them sound sung, and therefore,
not necessarily logical. The accents in her speeches
did not fall naturally, where they might have if merely
spoken. Perhaps it was Mr. Harrison’s decision,
as writer and director, to have sung verse be the method
for the chorus of women and Ms. Redgrave to speak their
lines. The evil men in the production did not do so,
though one actor did have the distinct lilt of a Brooklyn
accent. The disastrous consequences of war on women
and children are starkly demonstrated, but the singsong
quality of the performances undercut the emotional impact
of the message. With Ms. Redgrave, the stilted way she
delivered her lines also often rendered her inaudible.
One looks to The Royal Shakespeare Company for exemplary
spoken performances, and so this aspect of an otherwise
effective production was a disappointment.
Artistic excellence?
***
Entertainment? ***
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? ***
(Updated on 9/16/05)
|
|
|
| Theater
review
|
photo: Het Laagland's production
of King A
|
King A
The New Victory Theater
Performed at: The
New Victory Theater
Reviewed on 5/13/05
by Joan Musaro
|
| Chivalry
Lives
|
| Inez
Derksen, director of Holland’s Het Laagland Theater
production of King A, believes that the spirit and nobility
that guided the fabled knights of Arthurian legend live
to this day in anyone who takes a stand, upholds a principle,
and chooses to do the right thing. Yet the tale of King
Arthur, his knights, and the affair his wife had with
Sir Lancelot is not exactly a child’s fairy tale.
To appeal to higher ideals of personal courage, sacrifice,
loyalty, and pride was a good way to symbolically bring
the meaning of the story to the many children in the
audience.
To establish historical perspective for
the story, the actors, all men plus one woman (girls
can be knights too), carried and waved giant flags representing
the symbols of the period, the heraldry and drama of
royalty and battle. When not carried, the flags served
as minimal scenery in the background. The only other
scenery was a number of the small wooden chairs that
any child who has attended nursery school knows well.
These chairs were stacked, manipulated, and placed in
a circle to represent the legendary round table. This
minimal approach was creative and set the scene well.
However, the troupe’s efforts had varying degrees
of success.
First, the good parts: All the actors had
terrific energy, running and jousting, climbing the
chairs, swordfighting, and making speeches with conviction
and skill. The characters were introduced through monologues,
their roles named, personalities described, and relationships
clarified. King Arthur is reluctant to take power, although
elected by his peers to be in charge. Once king, he
seeks to involve his knights in governing decisions
and will not do battle unless it is for the common good—more
lessons for the children. The noble ideals of community
improvement and civilized decision-making were explored.
However, the actors often spoke very fast, and while
they are fluent in English, their Dutch accents were
difficult to understand. The guidelines for moral behavior
that they were describing, important but sophisticated
concepts for children to understand, were thus made
even more obscure.
All the actors were highly skilled. Vincent
Rietveld was good as the king, if not especially dashing.
Anke Engles, as Guinevere, literally held up the standard
for girls to be proud, and Maarten Smit was bold and
courageous as Lancelot. This production was inventive
but a bit too mature in presentation for the young audience
in attendance.
Artistic excellence?
***
Entertainment? ***
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? ***
(Updated on 9/16/05)
|
|
|
| Film
review
|

Photo: Warner Bros. Entertainment
Inc.
|
Batman Begins
Reviewed on 6/19/05
by Kathleen Scheiner
|
| Batman
Begins: How the Man Becomes the Bat
|
| With
the typical superhero movie, the character's motivation
for donning tights comes early in the film, is usually
only a couple of minutes long, and is shot in soft focus.
It's become part of the formula for this formulaic genre.
Batman Begins smashes this convention by obsessively
dwelling on what makes Bruce Wayne, Batman's alter ego,
want to put on a black, rubberized costume to fight
crime. The result is a darker vision than the usual
superhero fare, but it is much more satisfying.
The credentials are heady for this fifth
installment of the Batman franchise, and it’s
hard not to expect something monumental from the team
assembled. Christopher Nolan, who blew critics away
with Memento in 2000, directs this production and kicks
in help with the screenplay as well. The cast is loaded
with heavy hitters, including two Oscar winners in supporting
parts, such that relative newcomer Christian Bale, in
the role of Batman, seems in danger of being outshone.
Happily, Bale holds his own, showing range as he goes
from would-be murderer to flippant playboy to avenging
bat.
The other Batman movies have taken off
with the fully formed Batman, but this film fills in
the blanks between normalcy and superhero. Young Bruce
Wayne, born to privilege, loses his parents during a
robbery gone wrong, after the family is placed in a
precarious position brought on by Bruce himself. Wayne’s
wealthy parents were humanitarians with a penchant for
reforming Gotham, and this influence leaves its mark
on their son. As Bruce Wayne grows up, the constants
in his life are his butler, Alfred (Michael Caine),
and the Wayne manor, symbol of everything the boy has
lost. (Much like Jiminy Cricket in Pinocchio, Alfred
often serves as the conscience for Bruce Wayne/Batman.)
The young man is wracked with guilt over his parents’
deaths; when his feelings find a deadly outlet, Wayne
flees Gotham and becomes an apprentice to the martial-arts
outfit League of Shadows. After a falling out with his
mentor, Wayne returns to Gotham, and Batman is born
out of guilt and phobias.
Bruce Wayne is an impressive physical specimen,
but he has a harder row to hoe than many of the superheroes
who receive their powers from the blessings of the gods
or a science experiment gone wrong. Wayne gets help
from a member of the family business, Lucius Fox (Morgan
Freeman), who outfits Batman with the necessary accoutrements
to complement his brawn.
This movie towers head and shoulders over
the other Batman films, and the leads of Batman Begins
have already committed to doing another installment,
promising more great entertainment to come.
Artistic excellence?
****
Entertainment? ****
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? ****
(Updated on 9/14/05)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regard the "Stars"
as Below:
***** Excellent!
**** Good!
*** O.K.
** Nah!
* I suffered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|