|

|
The Arts Cure
October/November 2004
|
|
| REVIEWS
| Read
in Japanese
©2004 Dance Project SEQUENCE,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Contents of this magazine
may not be reproduced in whole or in part without
permission.
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Stormy Days with Josephine/Fragments —Simple
Separations
Meg Wolfe/Barbara Mahler
Performed at Danspace Project St. Mark’s Church
Reviewed on 11/14/04
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| French Emperor Can’t Keep His Lady in Line |
|
With aristocrats losing their heads at the drop of a dime, the 18th century was
a scandalous time for love. And the Empress Josephine Bonaparte must have been
a handful for one little man, Napoleon. With Stormy Days With Josephine,
choreographer Meg Wolfe examined the famous couple’s tumultuous relationship
through postmodern movement blanched in baroque.
Abstract scenarios represented aspects of human nature, hinting at repressed, underlying
feelings people have for others, the anguish of abandonment, and the freedom of personal liberation.
A metaphor for the pent-up frustration one encounters with sudden changes in social standing, such
as Josephine experienced upon her coronation, occurred in the opening scene. One dancer gingerly
avoided a bunch of lemons that had been dropped upon the floor, eventually aiming her stomping
feet at the fruits, squashing them, building aggression to the point of finally taking one in her
hands and tearing it apart to the music of Lyris Hung’s electric violin.
What better way to escape the confines of an imperial household than through sex? As the music
became baroque, a civilized minuet careened into lesbian fantasy. Female dancers pawed at one another.
One pair rolled off in an erotic tumble. When Napoleon made his way out, looking ridiculous in period
costume, he didn’t have much of a chance against the estrogen orgy. Josephine collapsed with her lover
and in a terribly uncivilized segment of choreography, Napoleon ran out, leaped over them, and fell
over the edge of a platform.
In a swank but puzzling turn of scenery, the stage became a nightclub with potted palms and
piano music. A dancer in black suit and top hat moved gracefully to “Sophisticated Lady,” followed
by a video of Napoleon frolicking in the still water of a rocky bay. Off to the side, Josephine
poured an unidentified substance onto her hands and wrists and licked it off. Napoleon walked
frantically in circles center stage. Though the group created interesting scene changes, confusion
surrounded most of this piece.
Barbara Mahler’s Fragments—Simple Separations was performed first, setting a theme of personal
perseverance, where the line between resistance and indulgence is very thin. Featuring excerpts from
Shostakovich’s String Quartets, the piece showcased strong dance technique. Striking choreography
occurred while two women matched movements on the ground. They longed for rest but could only stay
in one position for a moment before flailing into another pose.
For the most part, movements rocked with pendulum-like momentum, except during slow adagio
sequences, when limbs extended with much control, and poses were held for great lengths. To end the
piece, Mahler climbed into a handstand feet first up a pillar, weight supported by her palms pressed
to the floor—an unlikely approach to the final destination, but why not? Very little makes sense in
this new era of freedom and technology. Vive la liberté!
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? **
Was it inventive? **
Was it healing? **
(Updated on 6/9/05)
|
|
|
| Theater
review
| 
|
| Dora
Theatrical Company
Senpo Sugihara,
The Japanese Schindler
Performed at:
Reviewed on 10/24/04
by R. Pikser
|
| The Best of Men |
| In 1939, career
diplomat Chiune “Senpo” Sugihara was Japanese
consul in Kaunas, Lithuania. When Nazi Germany invaded
Poland and sent thousands of Jews fleeing for their
lives, some of them came to neutral Lithuania. No country
would take them in; the Dutch consulate did give them
visas to Dutch Curaçao, but these were technically
valueless, since occupied Holland presumably could no
longer issue visas. Against explicit orders from his
Foreign Ministry, Sugihara, pretending not to notice
the non-validity of the Dutch visas, wrote thousands
of transit visas so as many Jews as possible could escape
soon-to-be-occupied Lithuania, cross the USSR, and at
least have a chance to get to the Netherlands Antilles.
Koichi Hiraishi’s version of Mr. Sugihara’s
story focuses not only on him, but on two escaping Jewish
families. If Senpo Sugihara himself is drawn in rather
restrained fashion, the families provide the small events,
the bickering and humor, the negative outlooks and the
hopeful ones that bring a human scale to the terrible
events all these people are living. Moreover, the play
is not about the goodness of a single man, but the degree
to which each of us is responsible for our fellow human
beings. When Sugihara, his consulate closed and his
safety compromised by the invading Soviets, finally
boards the train to his new posting in Berlin, he can
honestly say that he has done everything that he could.
Those members of the self-organized Jewish Refugee Committee
who gave their lives so that others could escape can
say the same, as can the Sugiharas’ Chinese cook,
returning home to fight the invading Japanese. Even
the consular secretary, not a very noble person, somehow
learns to surpass his limitations. Senpo Sugihara, too,
is seen to have moments of doubt, and needs his wife’s
firmness of vision to shore him up. The play is truly
about the connectedness of all of us. The leisurely
pace of the direction by Mr. Hiraishi and Shoichi Yamada
gives the audience time to reflect on the extent to
which we ourselves can say, with Mr. Sugihara, that
we have done everything possible to save the lives of
those who need our help to survive.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? *****
(Updated on 2/9/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Okinawa Kumiodori
Reviewed on on 10/2/04
by R. Pikser
|
| The Beauty of Control |
| American readers may not be familiar with the history
of Okinawa, the group of southernmost islands of the Japanese archipelago. In the 14th century, the
islands formed the independent kingdom of Ryukyu. Later, Ryukyu fell under first Chinese, then
Japanese, influence, and eventually was absorbed by Japan as a prefecture. The United States still
maintains many army bases on the Okinawan islands, presumably as a residue of World War II.
In the 18th century the king of Ryukyu solicited the development of court dance, and Kumiodori was developed. The contact
with China, Korea, and Japan led to elements of these countries’ art forms (Noh, Kabuki, Chinese opera, Kyogen, and puppet
theater) being blended into Kumiodori, along with elements of traditional indigenous dances concerned with agricultural
rituals. Kumiodori includes acting, singing, and dance, all performed in the most controlled and stylized of fashions.
In fact, one of the main techniques seems to be absolute control and absolute invariance of dynamics, rhythm, and attack.
This was true of the dances in the first half of the program and also of the stylized chanting and movement in the
excerpt from the play, "Nido Tekiuchi," that formed the second half of the program. For a Westerner it was unnerving to
see the unvarying facial expressions and body language of two boys while they spoke of their excitement at setting off
to kill their father’s murderer and while they tearfully (according to the words) bid their mother good-bye. The musicians
and singers accompanying the play had an interesting role in that they not only enriched the action, but sang of what was
going on in the characters’ minds, belying the rigidly calm exteriors of the actors.
One can only wonder what moves a culture to be so in need of total control of the outward expression of mind and body. Okinawa
Kumiodori clearly demands more study and exposure than a one-night concert before it can even begin to be appreciated.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 3/10/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
Pina
Bausch Tanztheater Wuppertal
Für die Kinder von Gestern, Heute und Morgen (For the Children of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow)
Reviewed on on 11/20/04
by R. Pikser
|
| Positive Depression |
| Pina Bausch
is an extremely intelligent woman who is clearly trying
to tell us something. What that something is may be
arguable. At the start of this piece, which takes place
in a completely white box with gaping black openings
right, left, and upstage, two men sit beside each other
on a table. They neither look at each other nor acknowledge
each others’ presence. Yet when one of them is about
to topple off the table, the other, at the very last
moment, just manages to save him in a spectacular, teetering
balance. Neither one reacts to what has happened, though
they repeat the same event several times. The two major
themes of the piece are thus presented: lack of connection
yet people coming through for each other at the last
moment in times of crisis. People reach out to each
other; they are responded to or rebuffed; they experience
pain and isolation. But when they are about to fall,
someone—not necessarily the person they had reached
out to—saves them.
Für die Kinder is constructed of theatrical-type events with props, or small dialogues, interspersed with po-mo solos that,
with minor variations, all seem to be the same solo. The dancers are wonderfully trained, lithe and light, yet the solos
express nothing other than po-mo’s general solipsism. Perhaps this style was chosen to express the lack of connection,
but the opening sequence shows that, with thought, more visceral communication could be used to express the same thing. The dialogues,
short as they are, are much more telling than all the beautiful movement. The scenic variations of moving walls and
sand castles are interesting and provide the information that life is hard, no matter our surroundings.
Ms. Bausch has an interesting mind and, though some
of what she shows us may not be totally clear, she,
like her dancers, is reaching out and hoping she—or
we—will catch the other. Her message to the children
is not a happy one, but it is honest.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 3/10/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
American Ballet Theatre
Performed at: City Center
Reviewed on 10/31/04
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| Charmed By A Mouse, Wooed By A Rose, ABT Delights Again |
| American Ballet Theater brought some Halloween magic to City Center during its October 31 matinee performance. As Angelina Ballerina took the stage for the world premiere of Kevin McKenzie’s The Ballerina, little girls in fairy wings and princess crowns squealed with delight. The oversized white mouse in pink tutu emerged from behind the curtain to greet the audience between pieces, and eventually found herself in the spotlight, sharing the stage with a bemused Veronika Part and Maxim Beloserkovsky. Lacking the typical ballerina physique, Angelina interrupted the passionate drama going on between the two principals to carry out her own choreography with sweet concentration, and even snuck in a lift.
The company also included some classical choreography among the juvenile entertainments. Herman Cornejo danced the part of the rose and Xiomara Reyes the young girl in Michel Fokine’s enchanting Le Spectre de la Rose. Reyes beautifully took on the role of the dreamy girl remembering the magic of her first ball, swooning in her chair, sniffing languidly at her rose, and finally dancing with its spirit. Cornejo recalled Nijinsky’s passion as he sauntered demurely around the room before making that infamous and majestic leap out the window.
Themes And Variations, featuring Gillian Murphy and Marcelo Gomes in Balanchine’s choreography, opened the performance. Gomes made up for his unremarkable power with fantastic grace. Joined by Murphy’s clean, expressive lines, the two resembled a pair of porcelain figurines in their slow pas de deux that incorporated many fine balancing points. Regal and poised, the corps brought an aristocratic, Russian flair to the stage, as they demonstrated great strength and flexibility.
Grand Pas Classique, with Michelle Wiles and David Hallberg followed. With bold style and exquisite balance, Wiles impressed with frequent arabesques held en pointe for many moments, while Hallberg’s muscular legs executed glorious leaps.
The brass section moved up from the pit to flank the stage for the last piece, Sinfonietta. Jiri Kylian’s choreography for five movements focused on the synchronicity found in nature. The dancers' fluid costumes and wispy movements matched the watercolor hues of the rolling hills of the backdrop. Wavelike scenarios where one dancer’s leap ended in a pirouette followed by another dancer, and another, mimicked the organic beauty of deer prancing through long grass, or the erratic yet perfectly composed flight patterns of birds.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 3/3/05)
|
|
|
| Theater
review
| 
Photo: Carol Rosegg
|
| Pan Asian Repertory Theatre
Mom, Dad, I’m Living with a White Girl
Performed at: Church of St. Paul and St. Andrew
Reviewed on 10/16/04
by R. Pikser
|
| Are We There Yet? |
| Mark Gee, who may well be partly derived
from playwright Marty Chan, is young and second-generation Chinese, and all he wants is
to integrate himself into the larger Canadian society and leave his roots behind. His
white girlfriend, Sally, a script reader, is currently working her way through an
outrageous B-movie spy story that exploits every racist stereotype from Sax Rohmer
through Jackie Chan. In Pan Asian Repertory Theatre’s new production Mom, Dad, I’m
Living with a White Girl, this ridiculous movie script forms the subtext to Mark’s
relationships, not only with his parents, but with the sinophilic Sally herself. As
the youngsters struggle to define themselves and those relationships, they deal with
the added burden of Mark’s parents’ disapproval. The Gees don’t want him homogenized
into Greater Westernness, and in fact Mark himself, deep down, is not quite sure
that’s what he wants either.
Director Ron Nakahara has once again turned the empty space of the intimate chapel at the Church of St. Paul
and St. Andrew into a magical theater space. The script tends to get bogged down in its central joke—the
terrible thrall in which the son finds himself to the power of the Yellow Claw, represented by his mother
who, it turns out, is herself in thrall to her position as an immigrant. The blocking, often imaginative,
could have been developed further to avoid a feeling of repetitiousness. The actors romp through the script
with great good humor, but they too have been allowed to maintain their characters at the one level at
which they are written. While this is not a grave sin in the B-movie sections, if in the more serious
sections the actors had worked against the script’s limitations, they would have done a great service
to this play, better preparing the audience for the depth and understanding shown in the last scene.
This intelligent play tries to be more than a sitcom, and merits an extra assist from its cast. Just
as it is, though, it is funny, thought provoking, and a pleasure to see. It poses never-ending
questions for members of minority groups that perhaps can never be answered, but which must be
dealt with, over and over again. Sometimes the need comes from the inside and sometimes the need
is imposed from without, but the tension is always there, for well or ill.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? *****
(Updated on 3/8/05)
|
|
|
| Theater
review
| 
Photo: Sonoko Kawahara
|
|
The 2004 ChekhovNOW Festival with Crossing
Jamaica Avenue
The Cherry Orchard:
Firs' Dream
Performed at: The Connelly Theater
Reviewed on 11/7/04
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| Fluttering Through Fragility in a Changing World |
| Gender is
irrelevant in the realm of solitude, as director Sonoko
Kawahara established in her adaptation of Anton Chekhov’s
famous play, The Cherry Orchard: Firs’ Dream.
Chekhov’s male butler Firs becomes a female
housekeeper played with feverish demureness by Dawn
Eshelman, who after serving the same family for two
generations, finds herself floating, with brief acknowledgment,
through a tumultuous household. Eventually, she is forgotten
altogether, left alone in the winter chill outside a
locked and abandoned house.
Part of the fifth annual ChekhovNOW Festival at the
Connelly Theater, the play began with this scene, in
the original the last, setting a tone of misplaced settlement
and forlorn nostalgia. A sparse stage amplified the
stark individuality of each of the characters, portrayed
by a talented group of actors, who are introduced brusquely
through unfolding scenes, like the eccentric relatives
that creep out of the woodwork for holiday dinners.
Except this crew is bubbling with personality peculiarities,
every single one of them just a bit mentally offbeat;
their emotional hankerings emerge as the group convenes
at the family home.
Rachel Neuman played the wild governess Charlotta with
sassy gloom. The children are all grown, but she hangs
around entertaining with ventriloquism and magic tricks.
David Altman was politely funny as quirky clerk Epihodov,
declaring his “one misfortune every day.”
And Esra Gaffin was memorable as the feisty maid Dunyasha.
They’re all held together by Ryubov (Kathleen
O’Neill Toledo), the proper, delirious mother,
who escapes the death of her child by running away to
Paris with her lover, and upon returning to the ancestral
home is beside herself with the idea of hawking her
beloved cherry orchard to money-hungry hackers. But
alas, what choice is left when the money’s gone?
Ryubov must bid adieu to the only constant in her life,
dutifully bursting with pink blossoms in the spring,
standing still and serene beneath a glistening white
coat in winter--the blow is devastating for the already
fragile-minded woman.
The most beautiful sequence occurs at the end. As Firs
falls into slumber, she finds herself center-stage as
delicate, pink petals fall from above. She is happy
and smiling as the others join her, laughing and playing,
dressed all in white, grabbing at the petals and tossing
around a pink chiffon sheet. All minds are finally at
peace. No anguish over lost pasts, no turmoil over unrequited
love, no more fear for the future.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 2/9/05)
|
|
|
| FILM
review
|
|
School of Rock
Reviewed on 10/28/04
by Taro Enjoji
|
| I Want a Teacher Like That |
| School
of Rock, a release from last year, is impressively
directed by Richard Linklater and stars Jack Black of
There’s Something about Mary and Shallow
Hal fame. Duey Finn (Black) is a guitarist in love
with rock music. While dreaming of an unprecedented
major debut, he ends up getting kicked out of his own
band. The seldom-employed Duey is even about to be kicked
out of his apartment by his close friend and roommate,
Ned Shunibury (Mike White), for not paying his rent.
That’s when Duey answers a phone call meant for Ned,
offering a good job at a private elementary school;
masquerading almost by accident as Ned, Duey gets the
job and becomes a substitute teacher. At first our hero
is enthusiastic about the job, but the school turns
out to be a lot more strictly managed and less freewheeling
than he had imagined. Duey doesn’t intend to be a real
teacher, but events conspire against him: Passing the
music room by chance, he notices that his own students
have musical talent. So, somewhat clumsily, he starts
working with the kids to realize his own dreams through
them. How do you suppose Duey and his students finally
end up?
When this film came out, contrary to expectations it
got a lot of repeat customers. School of Rock was
number one at the box office for four weeks running
in New York, and became a huge hit around the country,
earning around $90 million in the first month. Overall,
the acting and photography improved with every shot.
Jack Black, who’s also the frontman for the band Tenacious
D, performs all his own musical scenes, and the casting
for the children’s roles avoided typical Hollywood child
actors—the number one requirement was the ability to
perform music. School of Rock lacks the usual preachy
quality of movies about education, going in a completely
different direction than one might expect from the school
setting. This type of hero is rarely seen in American
movies, and Duey’s childlike heart and the process of
his and the children’s growth together is portrayed
with humor, giving us the kind of movie that can be
thoroughly enjoyed by young and old, male and female
alike.
The songs performed by Jack Black in the movie have also been issued as an album (which Black also produced), a collection not just for rock fans, but which anyone who likes music can enjoy. My strongest feeling after seeing this movie was, “I wish a teacher like this would turn up in Japan some day!”
(Updated on 3/2/05)
|
|
|
| FILM
review
|
|
HBO Films/Fine Line Features
La Niña Santa
Reviewed on 10/11/04
by R. Pikser
|
| A Slice of Someone’s Life |
| Although not
Cannes or Sundance, the New York Film Festival is still
a prestigious venue where time and space are made for
young filmmakers. La Niña Santa (The Holy Girl)
was written and directed by Lucrecia Martel, a promising
newcomer invited back to the 2004 NYFF, this time with
the influential Pedro Almodóvar as one of her executive
producers. Certainly this film about the senses, sensuality,
and sexuality is tightly made from the point of view
of the interrelationship of themes to images, and certainly
it has moments of Almodovarian titillation.
A sister and brother, Helena and Freddy, own a small,
European-style hotel, with rooms of a size appropriate
for sleeping, not entertaining. Helena and Freddy live
in these rooms, so they spend some intimate, casually
sensual moments in bed together, complaining about their
ex-spouses and trying to sort out their lives. Helena’s
stolid daughter, Amalia (Maria Alché), and her buddingly
salacious friend Josefina (Julieta Zylberberg) are discovering
their sexuality while titillating themselves with the
exquisite mental torments of possibly dedicating themselves
to Jesus. Into this hothouse atmosphere spills a medical
conference at which the uptight Dr. Jeno (a suffering
Carlos Belloso) agonizes over the incipient perversions
he hasn’t the courage to fully indulge.
The setup is interesting, as is the filmic technique of truncated shots suggesting the inconclusiveness
of the characters’ emotional yearnings. But we are thrown into the middle of these lives with no
explanation. We spend time and energy trying to figure out what is going on without learning
anything about the characters. Perhaps if Ms. Martel were surer of what she wanted to say, she would
not have shied away from clearer presentation. She has tried to substitute formal elements for
substance, but a film about people must have both. A film about incompleteness cannot leave the
viewer feeling incomplete.
In Flowers for Diana, an eight-minute short
by Reynald Bertrand accompanying La Niña Santa,
the film crew trails after a belligerent freeloader
as her friends and family extricate themselves from
her temper tantrums. We are not sure whether she is
psychotic and falling apart, whether she is just a self-centered
bitch, or whether the film is a put-on—but the filmmakers
are clear in what they want to show and in how they
want to show it. Unlike La Niña Santa, Flowers for
Diana is exactly as long as it needs to be and
does everything it needs to do.
Artistic excellence?
***
Entertainment? ***
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? ***
(Updated on 3/8/05)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOP
Home
About
Us Contact
Us Advertise
with Us Terms
of Use
©2004 Dance Project SEQUENCE, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|