|

|
The Arts Cure
June/July 2004
|
|
| REVIEWS
| Read
in Japanese
©2004 Dance Project SEQUENCE,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Contents of this magazine
may not be reproduced in whole or in part without
permission.
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: Lois Greenfield
|
|
Jennifer Muller/The Works
Performed at: The Joyce
Reviewed on 6/15/04
by Tamsin Nutter
|
| Muller’s 29th-Anniversary Variety-Pak |
| Jennifer Muller/The Works’ 29th-anniversary season
featured a bouquet of collaborators, a fine cast of dancers, and, at the gala performance, plaudits
from luminaries such as playwright Edward Albee. Yet the dances themselves proved somewhat disappointing.
Hymn for Her, a duet for Kuo Chi-Tsung and the expressive Yumiko Yoshikawa, is a conceptually beautiful allegory of grief:
A woman sits in a black armchair, her eyes fixed elsewhere; above her head, a man sits in a swing, his eyes on her. He
tries to engage her, but she can’t see him from her black chair of mourning. But time passes, and gradually Yoshikawa
begins to reconcile herself to the presence of grief in their relationship. The idea is truthful, but the choreography
is somewhat trite, and Geoffrey Menin’s music extremely so.
The premiere A Candle at Both Ends showcases Leda Meredith, in a bravura performance as a harried, fast-quipping
executive, and composer Marty Beller, who creates a wonderful onstage percussion score using the clutter of her
office (the great decor and costumes are by Stageworks). We all know citydwellers like this one—yet Meredith’s
litany of complaints and observations isn’t quite off-kilter enough for moments-of-truth like "Why are you doing
this job? Oh yes—it’s my passion” to come off. Perhaps it’s the paucity of movement amid the talking.
For Ecstatic Poems, based on 14th-century Sufi poetry, Muller involved distinguished collaborators: Cambridge
scholar Peter Avery, musician Sussan Deyham, and guest narrator Iraj Anvar, all specialists in Persian arts.
The ghazal in question, read beautifully by Anvar in both Persian and English, are intimate, mystical lyrics
in which spiritual devotion and romantic love fuse. Yet the resulting dance gave me the nasty creeping feeling
of Orientalist softcore fantasy. Dancers swathed in pastel batik fabric reach to the light, process like pilgrims
or slaves, pose as goddesses and temple acolytes, and toss their long hair while being pelted with rose petals.
The imagery of the poetry, in other words, is interpreted so literally as to lose all its mystery.
Infinitely sexier is the slightly sinister Flowers, inspired by Barbara Bordnick’s flower photographs. Dancers in beautiful,
brightly colored wide trousers (by Karen Small, Nick Putvinski, and Stageworks) zoom energetically against the shifting backdrop,
flowers projected almost indecently large, to Laurence Nachsin’s dramatic music. Here Muller’s choreography is more punctuated
and less repetitive, and unison group work gives it welcome backbone. Delicacy alternates with a certain savagery in the
movement, as misty tulips give way to Venus flytraps, resulting in the evening’s strongest work.
Artistic excellence? **
Was it entertaining? **
Was it inventive? **
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 4/12/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
|
Swan Lake
American Ballet Theatre
Performed at: Joyce Soho
Reviewed on 6/16/04
by Tamsin Nutter
|
| Enticingly Dangerous in a Black Velvet Tutu |
| What to do
with old warhorses? In the ballet world, some radically
reinvent—think Matthew Bourne—while others remain slavishly
faithful to tradition. ABT artistic director Kevin McKenzie
finds a successful middle road with his 2000 production
of the perennial favorite Swan Lake, which,
while following Petipa closely enough to satisfy purists,
injects enough psychological drama to keep contemporary
audiences (and, I imagine, the dancers) interested.
At the performance I attended, ABT principals Irina
Dvorovenko and Maxim Beloserkovsky, also an offstage
couple, danced the roles of Odette-Odile and Prince
Siegfried. With his chiseled blond looks, Beloserkovsky
is almost absurdly handsome as Siegfried, and his dancing
is similarly lovely. But thoughtless young Siegfried,
like Colonel Pinkerton in opera, is a rather thankless
role, requiring some psychological subtlety if one wishes
to elicit audience sympathy. Beloserkovsky, an archetypal
danseur noble, left me rather cold.
Not so his wife. Dvorovenko possesses this bravura role,
her gorgeous technique physically dramatizing every
psychological moment; she languishes exquisitely, yet
has no shortage of speed or precision. Although she
exaggerates her body language beautifully in the White
Swan’s birdlike mannerisms, she’s even better as the
Black Swan, transforming completely as the femme fatale
Odile. Enticing and bold in black velvet, she flings
herself into the dangerous poses of her predatory pas
de deux with the prince. Yet she retains that echo of
Odette’s swan movements—made harsh, almost mocking—that
allows the infatuated Siegfried to delude himself that
the two women are the same. When Siegfried swears his
love to her, Dvorovenko’s final, triumphant backbend
is fantastically dramatic.
Odette’s court of enchanted swans danced
cleanly and well, but, unlike their queen, rather inexpressively.
Gennadi Sevaliev was engaging as Benno; Misty Copeland
shone throughout, particularly as a sassy Hungarian
Princess; and the often wooden Sascha Radetsky, as the
sorcerer von Rothbart, subjugated the women of the court
with scary charm. The marvellous Tchaikovsky score was
ably played by the ABT orchestra under the baton of
Charles Barker, and Zack Brown’s sets and costumes are
splendid. I particularly appreciated the folkdances
in Act III, in which the princesses competing for Siegfried’s
hand present the ethnic dances of their homelands. Unlike
the obligatory peasant dances in Act I, these interludes
don’t seem like filler. The Hungarian and Spanish dances
are particularly exciting, and all the dancers seemed
to be enjoying themselves. This production has few faults
and many merits—and Dvorovenko’s Odette-Odile should
not be missed.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 3/28/05)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: Stephanie Berger
|
Ashton
Celebration
Cinderella
The Royal Ballet
Performed at: Joyce Theater
Reviewed on 7/16/04
by Joan Musaro
|
| A Royal Fairy Tale |
| Britain's Royal
Ballet made a welcome return to New York this summer
during Lincoln Center's tribute to choreographer Frederick
Ashton. After several programs of pas de deux, the engagement
was dedicated to Sir Fred's Cinderella. This
new production is credited to Wendy Ellis Soames, with
sets by Toer van Schayk and costumes by Christine Haworth.
The new design begins with a giant fireplace, portraits
of Ashton and composer Prokofiev lovingly displayed
on the mantel. Cinderella's bleak home is first glimpsed
through the burning hearth, a device that imparts an
ominous feeling for so transcendent a tale. One unfortunate
change has occurred in the ballet's characterizations;
Cinderella's father seems barely there. Little of the
loving relationship between him and the lonely, motherless
girl remains, and their shared grief over the death
of Cinderella's mother is gone. Because of this, there
is little character development and little chance to
feel sorry for the young girl. She is still sad and
reflective-we see that in her movements-but far outweighing
the underlying pathos of the story is the hilarious
behavior of her two outrageously unattractive stepsisters,
especially when played by two of the public's favorite
former Royal principals, Wayne Sleep and Sir Anthony
Dowell. Indeed, they were having such a good time and
are both such terrific actor-dancers that Cinderella
was quite overshadowed any time these two grand dames
came on the stage. The tiny Sleep, prissily pretty,
and the usually handsome Dowell, sporting the ugliest
nose imaginable, were terrific together, playing to
their adoring public at every turn.
As the leads, Alina
Cojocaru as Cinderella and Johann Kobborg as the prince
eventually found each other and true love. They danced
well enough, but although they obviously have a good
relationship with each other as partners, they did not
overwhelm. Cojocaru is the "it" ballerina of the moment.
Tiny, with arched feet and a creamy movement quality,
she turns crisply and has high extensions. She also
dances every movement with similar force and tone, demonstrating
little nuance of energy, effort, or expression. She
looks sweet, but has none of the sensual allure or grand
manner so necessary in a prima ballerina-it is like
watching a child dance. Kobborg is stalwart, his partnering
and dancing secure though not exciting or powerful and
his feet surprisingly inarticulate for a Danish dancer.
Fortunately the beauty of the dances for the fairies
of the seasons has been retained.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 9/8/04)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
|
|
Coppélia
American Ballet Theatre
Reviewed on 6/25/04
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| Havoc And Heartache All For A Doll |
| Life-sized dolls, spirited young lovers, a delirious doctor, and dowries for all! Coppélia, 134 years after its Paris premiere, remains a quintessentially delightful ballet. Xiomara Reyes and Herman Cornejo danced the principal roles in American Ballet Theatre’s June 25 performance. A dashing match, they danced together with mischievous glee.
Set in an eastern European storybook village, the ballet examines the romance between Swanilda and Franz, who are suffering issues of the heart due to Franz’s advances toward Dr. Coppélius’s “daughter,” a beautiful mechanical doll named Coppélia. When the Burgomaster offers dowries to all couples wishing to marry, Franz must prove his love for Swanilda. Though not exceedingly poignant in his performance, Cornejo executed the role with strength and flair. A young dancer, he has the promise to one day really seize the part.
Reyes however was wonderful as Swanilda. At once irresistibly charming and regally arrogant, she moved whimsically across the stage with nimble ease and coquettish poise. When the time came to act aloof toward her lover, she turned haughty in an instant.
Humorous moments brought laughter to an already cheerful setting. When Swanilda discovers the key to Dr. Coppélius’s workshop, she leads a chain of nine friends, linked by their hands, tip-toeing through the door. Once inside, the curious clan delight in finding dolls of various nationalities, then cower with fear when they uncover Coppélia, a life-sized doll who daintily sits reading behind a curtain. The girls hide their faces, and their lithe legs shudder. When the raging doctor, played by Victor Barbee, arrives, all but Swanilda run away. She hides in Coppélia’s alcove as Dr. Coppélius apprehends a daring Franz, who has climbed up a ladder and in through a window in search of the beguiling doll.
While Franz passes out from too much of the doctor’s wine, Swanilda dons Coppélia’s costume. Impersonating the mechanical girl, she tricks Dr. Coppélius into thinking his magic spells have turned his doll’s movements from stark and jagged to graceful and human. Reyes is brilliant in this scene, holding the Spanish doll’s fan and dancing with lavish passion, or sporting an imperial sash and exuding playful ebullience, all the while impishly causing havoc in the workshop.
The lovers eventually run out together and join the group receiving dowries in the square. Swanilda offers hers to Dr. Coppélius in compensation for his damaged wares, but the Burgomaster gives him his own bag of gold.
Festive dance scenes interspersed the unfolding drama. Folk-inspired choreography set a lively tone as ten couples in traditional costume danced in the town square. At one point 12 child ballerinas pranced out, swathing the scene in fresh innocence. And two allegorical characters, Dawn, portrayed by Stella Abrera, and Prayer, danced by Veronika Part, added graceful mystery. The evening ended with a decadent finale of all the dancers. Their colorful attire blended in a medley of whipping organza and sequins.
Artistic excellence? *****
Was it entertaining? *****
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 11/16/04)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
|
Romeo
and Juliet
American Ballet Theatre
Performed at: Tokyo Postal Life Insurance
Hall
Reviewed on 7/03/04
by R. Pikser
|
| The
Sum Should be Greater than the Parts |
| Sir Kenneth
MacMillan, who died in 1992, was renowned as one of
ballet’s most innovative choreographers, especially
noted for the dramatic evocativeness of his choreography.
Romeo and Juliet is full of such movement for both minor
characters, such as the prostitutes in the town square,
and for the principles. Unfortunately, with a few exceptions,
the dancers of ABT, while technically clean, are not
trained to exploit the gifts the choreographer has given
them. Happily for us, Ethan Stiefel as Romeo is one
of those few. His technical abilities, in a quiet way,
keep him in the air just a moment longer, bring him
to his line just a bit sooner, and extend it into space
and time a bit longer than others, make him appear to
perform these feats as naturally as if he were walking.
Additionally, he can show us a brash youth infatuated
with a sophisticate and later he can show us an innocent
trembling with first love. These are not inconsiderable
gifts. Xiomara Reyes does not find her way into Juliet
until Act III, when we finally see the rebellious and
passionate girl described in MacMillan’s notes.
Of the secondary characters, Carlos Molina’s Tybalt
has some interesting moments of aggressiveness and Erica
Fischbach’s Lady Capulet is touchingly distraught
at Tybalt’s death. Herman Cornejo is technically
excellent as Mercutio but he does not take the risks
that the choreography and his name beg for, risks that
would make his Mercutio breathtaking and heartbreaking.
One might argue that the choreography takes care of
itself and that the dancer’s job is simply to
execute the steps cleanly. This attempts to reduce the
dancers to robots, obedient pieces of the choreographer’s
thoughts. When one sees the steps filled with life,
breath, and intelligence by Stiefel, set off and enriched
by the Renaissance tapestry of the Georgiadis sets and
costumes, lit by Skelton, one remembers that theater,
ballet included, is a collaborative art, and that when
each of the collaborators is reaching beyond him or
herself, they meet in a realm beyond that which was
imagined. That realm is where theater becomes magic.
Artistic excellence? *****
Was it entertaining? *****
Was it inventive? ****
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 9/28/04)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
|
Hommage To French Composers
The Faune Dance Troupe
Reviewed on June 20, 2004
by Celeste Sunderland
|
| Dancing to the Tune of a Frenchman |
| Claude Debussy’s Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune gave its name to the Faune Dance Troupe, a Japanese ballet company based in New York. The name is not so much a tribute to the composer as an allegiance to the group’s inspiration, Vladimir Dokoudovsky, who performed Vaslav Nijinsky’s choreography of the piece with the Ballet Russe in the 1940s. In June, the company paid tribute to the nation that named it with a three-piece program titled “Hommage To French Composers.”
Choreographed by company co-founder Miho Maeda Maurice Ravel’s Bolero incorporated a mix of savage, Grecian-inspired costumes and themes of mating and adoration. Almost Rite Of Springlike in its ritualistic nature, the dance occasionally mimicked the rippling patterns of the sea as long arms silently undulated. The dynamic intensified when the principal couple emerged. Noriko Naraoka leapt in like a ravishing crane, and Javier Dzul exuded the strength of a gorgeous warrior.
Despite an abrupt start, and its inappropriate placement between two longer, vivacious pieces that seemed to diminish its importance, Camille Saint-Saëns’s The Dying Swan still hung on to its intensity. Ninety-two years after Anna Pavlova first danced the piece, Maeda and Dokoudovsky worked together to restage Michel Fokine’s original choreography in 1999. Maeda presented the work again in this performance as a tribute to her now-deceased mentor. With tormented passion she executed the heartbreaking movements. Dressed in the traditional swan costume, her long body and seemingly endless, lanky limbs mimicked the swan’s desperate wings as they strove to overcome their crippled reality before finally giving out. She was visibly overcome as she took her bow.
Continuing a theme of death, Maeda’s interpretation of George Bizet’s Carmen, that seductive tale of illicit love and tragic envy, fizzed with the expected ruffled dresses and Spanish-tinged choreography. The company acted well, flashing amused or suspicious glances between flamenco poses. A sweetly flirtatious Naraoka danced the part of Carmen beautifully, but her clean, precise technique seemed a bit too innocent for a beguiling, aloof seductress. Nevertheless she drove both Don José (Dzul) and the Toreador (Venti Petrov) wild. Both powerful dancers, Petrov appeared delighted yet tormented by Carmen’s advances, and Dzul was visibly shaken after he thrust his sword into his gypsy lover’s side.
Though Debussy wasn’t included, the Faune Dance Troupe once again reminded us how ravishing French music can be. Let’s hope that next time they take on their namesake.
Artistic excellence? ****
Was it entertaining? ****
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 10/15/04)
|
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: Stephanie Berger
|
Ashton
Celebration The Joffrey
Ballet
Performed at: Metropolitan Opera House
Reviewed on 7/8/04
by Joan Musaro
|
| The
Joffrey Celebrates Ashton
|
| This year the
dance world celebrates the hundredth anniversary of
the birth of two choreographic giants, George Balanchine
and Frederick Ashton. For New York dance fans, the Joffrey
Ballet is closely associated with the great British
choreographer, having more of his ballets in their repertoire
than any other American company. It was fitting then
that Lincoln Center Festival's two-week tribute to Ashton
again brought the Joffrey to New York from their current
base in Chicago. The youthful, open, unaffected appeal
that characterize this company have always worked well
when presenting Ashton's works, and it still does.
This evening encompassed three distinct Ashton styles:
the Victorian, greeting-card beauty of Les Patineurs;
the cool, spare, otherworldly atmosphere of Monotones;
and the daffy, somewhat drunken, behind-the-scenes relationships
of A Wedding Bouquet. Each piece was performed
with the spirit, beauty, and attention to detail required.
Les Patineurs looked as lovely as ever. Set
on a frosty pond surrounded by filigreed iron screens
and overhead lanterns, velvet- and fur-clad "skaters"
glide, turn, and enjoy an evening on ice to the music
of Meyerbeer. Central to the ballet is the "boy in blue,"
a part requiring a virtuoso capable of both bravura
and lyricism. Masayoshi Onuki had good moments but displayed
tightness in his upper body and not quite the fluid
control so vital for an effortless display of technique
on a slippery surface. Far better were the four female
soloists. April Daly and Erica Lynette Edwards danced
with brilliant form and style as two skating partners,
while Deanne Brown and Julianne Kepley were masterful
in their turning variations.
With typical Ashtonian understatement, in Monotones
I & II Sir Fred creates a rarified and magical
atmosphere where the dancers appear suspended in space
and time. This is achieved through the precise execution
of "basic" steps and an uncanny association of movement
and Satie's haunting music. Clad in sleek bodysuits
and jeweled headpieces-cool lime in I, pure white in
II-the unison and precision of movement displayed by
the three dancers in each section resulted in a feeling
of harmony and wonder.
The third piece, A Wedding Bouquet, set to
the music of Lord Berners, was first performed in 1937.
Christian Holder spoke the Gertrude Stein narrative
but was severely hampered by a poor sound system. The
dancers performed this very British examination of the
not-so-proper behavior of the staff and guests at a
country wedding extremely well. Though an American audience
might find these characters quaint, the dance exemplifies
Ashton's great gift for drawing quick psychological
profiles (in this case, including a dog!) through movement
and humor.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? *** (Updated
on 8/31/04)
|
| |
| Dance
review
|

Photo: Takashi shikama
|
Asami Maki Ballet Tokyo
Performed at: Tokyo Postal Life Insurance
Hall
Reviewed on 7/16/04
by Yukihiko Yoshida
Translated by Atsuko Ono
|
|
|
| Asami
Maki Ballet Tokyo's recent production Dance Vingt
et Un X was a very rich performance. The company
performed four modern ballet pieces from the U. S. and
England, all with great success.
Serenade and Tchaikovsky Pas de Deux
were chosen from among George Balanchine's many great
works. In Serenade, the first piece Balanchine
created after moving to the U.S., a pose with one arm
raised sets the scene for this beautiful composition.
It was a pleasure to see the unconstrained dancing and
lovely technique of Tamiyo Kusakari (well known from
the movie Shall We Dance?) and the excellent
performing of Kentaro Morita. In this very romantic
piece, the music precedes the story. In Tchaikovsky
Pas de Deux, Rumi Tachibana and Ken Kikuchi dance
to Tchaikovsky's fantastic and spiritual music. This
is also a romantic piece, but there is a depth underneath
the innocence that conveys the universal elements of
human society, as well as the choreographer's range
as an artist.
William Dollar's Constantia, which depicts
the romances of the Polish composer Frederic Chopin,
is a gemlike masterpiece. It conveys Chopin's feelings
for both his lover George Sand and his early love Constantia,
to whom Chopin never told his true feelings. Opposite
the protagonist (Altankhuyag Dugarai), the femininity
of Sand (Manami Yoshioka) and the innocence of the Woman
in Dream (Yukiko Ito) created a nice contrast.
In Frederick Ashton's Birthday Offering, the
many candles placed on stage create another world for
the dancers. This piece, very English in its aesthetics,
is full of dreams about ballet expressed through variations
by both the male and female dancers.
These sophisticated pieces displayed the richness of
ballet to the audience. This is the tenth production
of a series reviving the classics of the 20th century
that otherwise might gradually fade into memory. As
ballet continues to become more and more popular in
Japan, performing Western masterpieces with high quality
provides a wonderful opportunity for Japanese audiences,
whose perspective will keep on expanding through seeing
such fine pieces onstage.
The dullness of Japanese modern ballet is often discussed.
In addition to seeing the originality of the past, I
also hope to see more new talents with the originality
of the future.
Artistic excellence?
****
Entertainment? ***
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? ****
(Updated on 8/13/04) |
|
|
| DANCE
review
| 
Photo: Stephanie Berger
|
|
Parsons Dance Company
Performed at: Joyce Theater
Reviewed on 6/13/04
by Tamsin Nutter
|
| Gimmickry
Run Amok |
| David Parsons’s
most famous gimmick was a stroke of genius: the strobe
light that transforms his simple jumping solo Caught
into gravity-defying magic. But the impression I received
from the Parsons Company’s “classic works” program presented
last June at the Joyce Theater was of slight choreography
almost completely obscured by gimmickry. Strobe lights?
That’s the least of it. Smoke machines, flashing rock-arena
lights, human disco balls... are we in Vegas yet?
Fill the Woods with Light opened promisingly: Dancers
carrying flashlights flit around a dark stage like fireflies
in summer. But overall the piece reads more like a lighting
designer’s portfolio than a coherent work of art—as
far as one can tell among all the special effects, the
choreography itself is pretty dull. One unrelated vignette
follows another, from a disembodied, upside-down pair
of bare legs that climbs and wiggles in midair (that
one was pretty cool), to an unseen person wearing hundreds
of tiny lights (the aforementioned human disco ball),
degenerating into a full-on Vegas finale of flashing
colored lights and posing silhouettes. The Envelope
also has good points but is ultimately unsatisfying:
one good idea spun out far beyond its limits. Sexless
people in balaclavas and sunglasses are troubled by
a mysterious envelope they seem unable to deliver—hijinks
ensue. Yet it never (alas) gets too weird to play in
Peoria. The serious faces of these peculiar postmen
as they spoof ballet movement are funny, but not that
funny.
The Last Breath was the one new piece of the evening,
and unfortunately quite the worst. Parsons stars in
a Butoh-inspired series of tableaus that picture a man’s
whole life—from his primordial stirrings to the titular
last breath. An interesting idea, but it’s executed
too simplistically, and Howell Binkley’s heavy-footed
visual design doesn’t help. To succeed the piece would
have to be infinitely denser and more genuinely mysterious.
Instead we are treated to far too much vague, obvious
inner-journey (as represented by Parsons running in
slo-mo through lavish swirls of smoke).
The best part of the slight, happy-cleancut-flower-children
dance My Sweet Lord is Katarzyna Skarpetowska and Sumayah
McRae, who are nothing short of dynamite, especially
together. Caught, still the deserved star of the evening,
was smoothly performed by associate artistic director
Elizabeth Koeppen. The final piece, the Brazilian-flavored
Nascimento, has some charms; yet the derivative choreography
never builds momentum. The dancers are strong and seem
to be having fun, but they deserve better—and so do
Parsons’s audiences.
Artistic excellence? ***
Was it entertaining? ***
Was it inventive? ***
Was it healing? ***
(Updated on 1/20/05)
|
|
|
| FILM
review
|

Photo: Fu Jun and Peng Xiaowei
|
Zhou Yu's Train
Produced (distributed) by: Sony Pictures
Classics
Reviewed on 7/18/04
by Ryoko Sugawara
|
| Searching
for a Lake in the Heavens
|
| Have
you ever lost sight of your journey's end? What if the
train you were riding wasn't taking you anywhere? Zhou
You's Train, based on the novel by AUTHOR'S NAME,
is a story about a woman on a journey, searching for
the light of love, suffering from its absence. She is
played by Chinese film star Gong Li, known for her roles
in Farewell My Concubine and Red Sorghum.
Zhou Yu is an artisan living in Sanming, an ancient
city along the Vietnam border. One day, she falls in
love with a poet, Chen Ching (Tony Leung Ka Fai), as
a result of a poem he sent her. She starts visiting
him in Chongyang, a journey that takes ten hours by
train. But while he gradually loses interest in the
affair, Zhou's passion seems to get stronger every time.
As the relationship starts to falter, Zhou meets a veterinarian,
Dr. Zhang, who is very different from Chen. Although
he has a rough manner, he gives her a sincere and stable
affection, and gradually she becomes able to accept
it. But they also come to realize that her heart has
never left Chen. Zhou continues to visit his apartment,
even though he has left Chongyang. Intertwined with
Zhou's story is that of another woman, Xiu, also played
by Gong Li. With a book of Chen's poetry in her hand,
Xiu travels around searching for traces of him and for
Zhou herself. In a poem, he compares Zhou to a lake
in the heavens. Is it this dream love that has made
these two women so intoxicated?
The editing elaborately mixes past and present, the
point of view alternating between passionate Zhou and
cool-headed Xiu. The film aptly conveys Zhou's confusion
and irritation through her experiences of love. Director
Sun Zhou emphasizes the traveling scenes in the train
(which play a small part in the novel): the passing
scenery through the window, the train entering a tunnel,
and languorous Zhou, passing among the seats with a
cigarette between her fingers. The succession of images
evoke Zhou's heartrending feelings. And the music by
Japanese composer Shigeru Umebayashi (In the Mood
for Love) heightens the sentiments.
As the poet dreams of a lake in the heavens, Zhou and
Xiu drift searching for the fountain of transient love.
As this intricate story unfolds, through their eyes
we catch a glimpse of scenes of love.
Artistic excellence?
****
Entertainment? ***
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? ****
(Updated on 8/13/04) |
|
|
| FILM
review
|

TM & COPYRIGHT (c) 2004 by Paramount
Pictures. All Rights Reserved.
|
Shogun
Produced (distributed) by: Paramount Home Entertainment
Reviewed on 7/18/04
by Taro Enjoji
Translated by Rieko Yamanaka
|
| Good
Old Japanese Culture, Through A Pair of Blue Eyes
|
| A
DVD edition has recently been released of Shogun,
the superb U.S./Japan epic TV miniseries originally
broadcast by NBC in 1980. The series is based on James
Clavell’s best selling novel of the same name, whose
protagonist was modeled after William Adams (Anjin Miura),
a real-life Englishman who washed up on the Japanese
shore in 1600. A magnificent cast of American and Japanese
actors portrays 17th-century Japan in upheaval on a
grand scale.
It is the dawn of the 17th century, and John Blackthorne
(Richard Chamberlain), an English navigator on a Dutch
trading ship, and a few surviving crewmembers are shipwrecked
upon the Japanese coast of Izu and held captive. In
the beginning, John, renamed Anjin by the Japanese,
is met with hatred by Omi (Yuki Meguro) and his men,
yet treated amicably by Omi’s boss Yabe (Frankie Sakai),
the lord of Izu. At this moment Japan is locked in a
power struggle between Ishido (Nobuo Kaneko), conqueror
of the West, and Toranaga Yoshii (Toshiro Mifune), chief
general of the Armies of the East, who are both watching
thirstily for the chance to seize the position of Shogun
or general-in-chief, wherein all the power of the general-in-chief
lies. It is in the midst of this upheaval that Anjin
fatefully encounters Toranaga. Anjin’s versatile knowledge
and experience prove useful to Toranaga, who begins
to consider trading with England should he come to power.
Toranaga’s interpreter Mariko (Yoko Shimada) coaches
Anjin on Japanese culture, and they eventually fall
in love. In a whirlwind of scheming, the adventures
of Anjin the blue-eyed samurai begin.
Back in 1980, Shogun proved so popular with viewers
that movie theaters and restaurants suffered a significant
drop in sales during the time it was aired, with audience
ratings reaching as high as 40%. Although Clavell, author
of the original book, was not Japanese, the series was
shot mostly in Japan. Throughout, the series creators
pay attention to detail and strive for authenticity
in tea ceremonies, swordfight choreography, horseback
riding, archery, Japanese etiquette, and visual art
(the placement of Japanese sliding doors, the patterns
on the kimonos, and so on), all backed up by well-researched
historical facts. The lack of special effects leaves
room for acting and pure imagery to vividly portray
good old Japanese culture, and the result is quite admirable.
In New York, Shogun can be purchased at Japanese
bookstores in a 5-disc DVD box set (540 minutes, Japanese
and English subtitles).
Artistic excellence?
****
Entertainment? ****
Inventiveness? ***
Healing power? **
(Updated on 10/1/04) |
|
|
|
|
TOP
Home
About
Us Contact
Us Advertise
with Us Terms
of Use
©2004 Dance Project SEQUENCE, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|